A couple of months ago, I was sitting at a bar with an acquaintance who works in Washington. He was dismissing John McCain’s chances for the presidency. The table was curious, so he elaborated. The story was convoluted, but apparently, on this or that training mission, McCain damaged a plane, and conjured a story to cover it up. In this particular gentleman’s view, this made McCain vulnerable to “swift boating”. For the first time since in this presidential campaign, I felt impassioned, indignant even. But why?
I am by no means a McCain groupie. I thought the 2000 “straight talk express” was about as heaping a pile of smartly effective PR bullshit as had ever been conjured. I found his anti-conservative stance nauseating. Why was he rejecting the very political apparatus that made his candidacy possible? I wasn’t the only conservative making this calculation. McCain became the first of three formidable candidates to lose to the decidedly (and intentionally) non-formidable George W. Bush.
But if there is one aspect of McCain’s life that is beyond reproach, it is his military service. You’ve heard the story, but it bears repeating. McCain entered Vietnam the son of a decorated admiral. After his plane was shot down (breaking several of his limbs), a mob beat McCain (breaking several more) and he was essentially left for dead. Again and again, he refused to meet with anti-war groups, refused to take the leave offered him on account of his birthright.
For more than five years, John McCain suffered myriad indignities, not the least of which were the intentional breaking of more limbs. All on behalf of an “unpopular” war with which the worst generation in American history had grown bored.
My fire was lit, so I interjected. I asked how any sort of Rovian effort (the swift-boating wasn’t Rove’s deal in the first place, but I digress) could call into question McCain’s military service, of all things. The fellow looked at me like he had never been asked that question before. This was his talking point, his incendiary tidbit of “insider” information with which he could impress the otherwise uninterested. He had no response.
See, John McCain did something for this country. Not only that, the thing he did had a tangible impact on the lives of other Americans. He stayed in a POW camp voluntarily. Doing so brought to light the conditions of that camp. He didn't just lay down his lives for others, as his position commanded, he suffered endlessly on their behalf.
And now, McCain has staked his political life on another unpopular war, again actively opposed by the worst generation, only now accompanied by their preachy, unbearable offspring (blogging from the basements owned by the former). While our servicemen risk their lives on the line in a desperate effort to make something of the malignant puzzle that is the Middle East, our college graduates are inspidly shouting “no war for oil!”
Such is the absurdity of the electoral landscape that the latter voice seems to be winning the day.
And so John McCain runs athwart the prevailing political malaise. He was for the war, has long rejected Rumsfeld’s “small army” tactics, and supported the surge. To date, the Iraq narrative has validated McCain’s policy stances. In other words, he has been right all along.
Then there is all the rest. McCain is pro-life. He used his political savvy deliver several circuit court justices (including likely Supreme Court nominee Janice Rogers Brown) by forming the “Gang of 14”. Though decried by Dobson and his band of quixotic absolutists, this compromise laid the groundwork for the confirmations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito.
Of course, McCain is one of the few who has actually done anything about the larger problem facing Republicans, namely a pork system that led to the scandals that removed them from power. While McCain’s initial overtures represented bad policy (see; McCain-Feingold), they at least represented the wrong solution to the real problem. McCain is sincerely interested in a more sincere Washington.
And that’s just it. There is something in McCain’s own narrative, something in those five years in the “Hanoi Hilton”, that speak to his leadership. His POW status didn’t just happen to him. At any point, he could have had his “do you know who I am?” moment, and ended the misery. The “Straight Talk Express” was the brainchild of an overpaid strategist, but McCain is, nonetheless, a straight talker. If John McCain were a phony, this fact would have been revealed decades ago.
Is his candidacy imperfect? Of course. Does he have impeccable conservative credentials? Nobody knows what that means any more. Is what John McCain wants for this country, ultimately, good? Yes, unless you are very liberal (a cursory glance at his platform answers this question). So let's ask the relevant question. Can he be trusted to do what he says he'll do, or is he a phony?
Make no mistake, we cannot afford a phony. It has been said that this election is about competence. I would argue that it is about focus and integrity, without which competence is merely the efficient execution of the abominable. We cannot afford to swoon over this or that candidate who says this or that about God, or abortion, or who the hell knows. Ideology aside, we need someone who is willing to stake his life, political or otherwise, in the defense of our country.
As such, I cannot come to any other conclusion. TPWK officially endorses Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) for the presidency of the United States.