On Palin
McCain's pick is Sarah Palin. You can hardly say the man doesn't take risks. I'll briefly skim the instapunditry surrounding this pick:
She's a woman Hillary supporters evangelical conservatives down syndrome hockey mom heartbeat away is she experienced Obama speech not news anymore.
That about covers that.
In my case for Lieberman, I wrote of Palin:
"Sarah Palin is the governor of Alaska. So is Ted Stevens."
And I'm a bimbo. Ted Stevens, obviously, is not also governor of Alaska. That said, I think my careless typo evinces a general indifference to/ignorance of all things Alaska, and Democrats will endeavor to exploit that. They will surely play the scandal card, will probably use it to offset the inevitable Ayers bombshell (no pun intended, w/r/t Ayers or Palin).
All things considered, she gets the edge. It would be tough to argue otherwise. Moreso, I think this pick is interesting for what it says about the political intelligence of McCain. On the heels of last nights savvy advertisement congratulating (albeit disingenuously) Barack Obama on his nomination, McCain has managed to completely reverse the course of momentum heading into the convention.
He kept a relatively surprising pick a secret until just hours before introducing her to the public. Tim Pawlenty and Tom Ridge did their able best to run interferences, with the former abruptly cancelling media appearances and the latter doing everything he could to signal himself as the guy. In the end, the press is floored, and McCain steals the thunder from Obama's pedestrian speech.
This wasn't rocket science, of course. McCain had this arrow in his quiver, and shot it at the expected time. He made a good pick that reinforces his reformer bonafides (I am assuming, at this point, that Palin's story checks out), fortifies his evangelical support, and maybe peels away 10% of Hillary moderates. Good for him.
The response from the Obama, however encapsualtes the disparity in political acumen between the two campaigns. Obama released two statements, the first declaring that the experience argument is off the table, the second dubbing Palin a pro-lifer who wants to overturn Roe v. Wade. They also clearly disseminated talking points to the radical base, suggesting they paint Palin as another Dan Quayle.
The purpose of their messaging is rather clear. As the Biden pick suggests, the Obama campaign would be delighted to take experience off the table. They presume Hillary's supporters to be staunchly pro-choice, and any opportunity to compare your opponent to Dan Quayle is a good thing, right?
Wrong.
Suggesting that experience be taken off the table only reinforces the fact that Obama doesn't have any. McCain is not going to purloin staunchly pro-choice votes, so there is no reason to remind evangelicals of Palin's credntials in this arena. And if Obama wants to set the bar at Dan Quayle, the McCain campaign will happily watch her clear that hurdle.
Obama would do well to call off the already incessant chants from the Kos set that she is a cheerleader, bimbo, or worse. If moderate women were upset at the way Hillary was "mistreated", references to Sarah Palin's breast size will certainly be unwelcome.
Obama will have the opportunity to make a reasoned argument againt Gov. Palin's qualifications for the Vice Presidency. Today, they should have taken a page from McCain's playbook, congratulating him on a historic pick, and awaiting an opportunity to discuss the issues in the coming weeks. By doing so, they would have afforded themselves the opportunity to interject Obama into these discussions.
Instead, as usual, Obama's campaign has shown a remarkable level of predictability, and a paucity of good sense. John McCain has out-executed Barack Obama at every turn, giving conservatives hope that we may yet avoid four years of the audacious disaster from Illinois.







.jpg)



